You found a journal.
Now check it before you submit.
Free Scopus record check in seconds. Full journal risk analysis when the record isn't enough.
One check before you submit could save you thousands of dollars and months of work.
Start with a free Scopus record check. Get your result in seconds.
We'll email you a copy of your result
Enter a journal name and your email.
Free · No card required
How do I know if a journal is predatory?
Here's the reality.
Publishing in the wrong journal can set your career back by a year. These are the numbers.
How to check journal credibility when blacklists fail
By the time a journal ends up on a blacklist, thousands of researchers have already been hurt. Arxivia analyzes live — publication trends, real article quality, actual scope alignment — at the exact moment of your request. No static database. No outdated entries. That's how to identify a predatory journal before it's too late.
Four steps, under 5 minutes
This is what you receive
A clear, actionable PDF — not a raw data dump
arxivia.ai · Risk Analysis Report · April 2025
International Journal of Applied Sciences
Rank #489/1,050 in Applied Sciences
High risk
Multiple risk signals detected. We recommend finding a safer alternative before submitting your manuscript.
Detailed analysis
High risk — proceed with caution
This journal shows a fee-driven volume pattern and a notable gap between site-listed and Scopus-indexed articles. Consider a safer alternative before submitting.
Simple, pay-per-use
No subscription. No expiry. Credits are yours to use anytime.
- Full risk PDF report
- AI-powered analysis
- Safe / Danger verdict
- Delivered by email
- Everything in Check
- 3 credits, use anytime
- Credits never expire
- Personal dashboard
- Everything in Guard
- 5 credits, use anytime
- Best value per analysis
- Priority support
How accurate are predatory journal checkers?
These researchers found out firsthand.
My colleagues lost more than $10,000 to predatory journals last year, and essentially a year of work for nothing. I pay APCs out of my own pocket, so I was genuinely afraid of ending up in the same situation.
I was under time pressure, and colleagues recommended a journal that promised a fast turnaround. The fee wasn't small, $1,200, but I still had doubts, so I checked it through Arxivia's AI Journal Risk Analyzer. The report immediately flagged clear predatory red flags, so I walked away.
Two months later, that journal was delisted from Scopus, along with every indexed article. Thank you, Arxivia 🙏, this tool saved me $1,200 and a year of my life.
The predatory journal problem has become especially serious in academia in recent years. I had doubts about a journal I was considering, so I decided to check it with Risk Analyzer.
What convinced me most was how detailed the report actually was: a clear analysis of the journal's publication trends over time, whether its articles matched its stated aims and scope, the quality of its abstracts, and a check on the publisher itself and how many articles were indexed. That's far deeper than a simple 'safe' or 'risky', I could actually see what the conclusion was based on.
The journal turned out to be safe, so I submitted my paper with real peace of mind. ✅
I've been publishing for a long time, and more than once in the past I ended up in predatory journals, which is a genuinely unpleasant experience. Predatory venues are especially active in the social sciences.
I publish 4–6 papers a year, and after that bad experience I'm always afraid of repeating the mistake, predatory journals get craftier every year. With this tool, I no longer worry: every journal is checked against concrete parameters, publication dynamics, topical fit, publisher reputation, instead of just getting a verdict with no explanation. 🔎
Everything you need to know
Answers to the most common questions about journal safety checking.